Sunday, December 9, 2012

Final Essay #2 Final Polish


December 2, 2012

New or expecting Parents

Dear Parents:

We want our sons to be nurturing and our daughters to be confident; in the end we want our children to be well-rounded. But first we need to recognize that at certain times in a child's development, he or she will establish gender ideals for how to be a male or woman. At this time of development a child connects gender to what they see from their surroundings, starting with their family. Traditionally it could be their father in the garage fixing the car and their mother in the kitchen preparing dinner. If a child's development consists of gender restricted rules or images their development will be dramatically different say that of a child surrounded by gender equal images. A child seeing their mother in the garage helping their father with fixing the car or seeing their father in the kitchen helping their mother prepare dinner can have a dramatic change in a child's development. I believe a simple change from traditional gender roles to equal gender roles can benefit development in a child. Traditional genders roles can lead to low self-esteem, depression and emotional disconnection while equal gender roles can lead to successful emotional connections, and better confidence in one’s self.

Most children develop a detailed sense of whether they are boys or girls at a young age. This sense of being "a boy" or "a girl" is called gender identity. For most children this develops somewhere between 18 and 30 months of age. Gender identity is established by whether one has long hair or short hair, whether one wears dresses or pants, and whether one plays with dolls or army action figures. After gender identity is formed, gender stability develops. Barb Durso explains gender stability is the realization that a girl will grow up to be a woman and a little boy is to grow up to be man. It is during this period of gender stability development that many children develop stereotypic behaviors suitable to their gender identity (Durso 2000). As a result girls sometimes refuse to wear pants because "only boys wear pants." This can happen even if the girl has a mother and other female role models who wear pants. On the other hand boys may become strongly interested in playing with toy guns and action figures.

Traditionally, culture has men and women living by different roles and rules that are gender specific. Men go to work to provide for the family, work around the house and expect dinner on the table at six. Women stay home, clean, take care of the kids and have dinner ready by six. Children at a young age are always learning from what they see and hear, they connect what their parents do to how they should do things. Children raised by specific gender guidelines will develop those same rules in adulthood.

A woman is given a set of rules similar to men's, but they still develop an ideal image of what a woman needs to be in a traditional household. For young girls seeing their mother do specific gender oriented jobs creates a gender image. For example, my sister is almost thirty years old and believes that she needs a boyfriend to live a normal life. She refuses to do any job that is oriented towards a masculine role, when asking her to help fix fence at the ranch she declines with answers that give her no confidence in her. She was raised thinking that women can’t do jobs that are masculine.

In a traditional house hold, young boys see their fathers living by detailed rules. These rules can be passed down for generations, from father to son, older brother to younger or even the media, and each one gives their ideals of masculinity. Author Micheal Kimmel in "Bros Before Hos" asks college men for their ideals of what it means to be a man, "never show your feelings, never ask for directions, never give up, never give in, be strong, be aggressive, show no fear, show no mercy... (Kimmel 609)" All of the answers he received describe a collection of attitudes and values that together describe what it means to be a man. These rules govern behavior and have required criteria that help a boy or man to be seen as a tough, strong, traditional figure of masculinity.

Personally I grew up in a family were my father would leave for work every morning at 4 am and my mother stayed home. My mother would take my sister and me to school every day then go home and tend to the house. When school ends my sister and I would get picked up by our mother and go home. Around 4pm. my dad would come home from work and dinner would be ready in an hour. It was like this every week day, it was a system my parents had along with designated jobs that had to be done in order for things to work. During the weekend things didn’t change much, there was still a system to fallow and it still had rules to be fallowed. I would help my father work, fix or build something every weekend, and that’s all I can remember us doing. If it wasn’t putting up fence in the horse paddock it would be building a chicken coop, everything we did was a “man’s job”. Being with my father every day and looking up to him as my main role model he taught me what it takes to be a man and how a man should act. I grew up fallowing the same rules my father grew up with and after watching him fallow these rules I have seen the effects they cause.

A traditional home leads to a difference in adulthood development between genders and disorders. It can have effects on self-esteem, disconnection from emotions, and depression. There are specific patterns of destructive consequences that develop with gender roles. Woman tend to be less confident and dependent on others while men lack the ability to express emotions and or are disconnected from social interaction. Micheal Kimmel says "Boys are more prone to depression, suicidal behavior, and various forms of out-of-control or out-of-touch behaviors than girls are (Kimmel 616)." It’s believed that boys suffer more from the traditional rules of the Guy Code because the code leaves boys disconnected from emotions and prohibited from sharing any form of feelings they have with others (Kimmel 616). For instance, many men restrict their emotions at times when a weak emotion begins to show. This may have positive moments such as the ability to stay cool in a crisis, but a drawback would be the failure to emotionally connect in a relationship. Overall, research has shown that gender roles are often related to larger problems including depression, anxiety, relationship problems, low self-esteem, violence, and a variety of other undesirable effects.

To go against the traditional it takes parents who don’t fallow the traditional. Times have changed and so have the roles of the men and woman. The gap between gender roles is narrowing. For fathers who had once worked away from the home start to stay home, they come to value their involvement in their child’s care in ways that reduce gender differences.  Along with fewer men believing that it's better for a woman to stay at home than to work. Men are also taking more responsibility for taking care of the children and household responsibilities, like cooking and cleaning. Noelle Chesley states in her research that men who have lost or quit their jobs have reported to be more sensitive to balancing work and home responsibilities once they returned to work full time. They also became more sympathetic to employees’ family issues and were less likely to downgrade a woman who had taken time off from a career to stay at home with children (Chesley 2011).  As the children see how men and woman can share in jobs and not have certain gender oriented jobs it becomes more socially acceptable. By not being confined to rigid gender roles based on foolish concepts of masculinity and femininity, people can respond to their own desires and abilities.

Traditional gender roles might be old fashioned however they are not outdated; while equal gender roles are relatively new they are a form of change. Change is slow yet change is always needed.  A child needs to see parents as equals in the house hold and in society for real change to take effect in their lives. The difference in development from traditional and equal may not seem as a necessary change, nonetheless we need to see masculinity and femininity roles as the same not as boundaries.

Sincerely,

 

 

 

George Howard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annotated Bibliography

-Chesley, Noelle. "Newswise." Nontraditional Family Roles Promote Gender Equality. University of

Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 16 Sept. 2011. Web. 09 Dec. 2012.

Noleel Chesley is a assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin, her article discusses the nontraditional family roles in couples households, and the economic or lifestyle changes in marital relationships that promote gender equality. Chesley interviews 21 couples in 2008, just before the economic downturn hit. Many swapped family roles because the men’s employment situation had changed and men were either not working or were working only part time. Chesley’s study included wives earning at least 80 percent of the household income. Her interviews showed that trading work and family roles was a complete change for both partners.

-Durso, Barb. "Gender Identity." Your Child's Development. N.p., 24 Sept. 2000. Web. 07 Dec. 2012.

Barb Durso is a board certified Pediatrician in private practice in Dallas, Texas. In her article she discusses child development and the stages a child will go through as he or she discovers if they are a man or female. Durso provides information on how most children develop a clear-cut sense of whether they are boys or girls at a young age. Gender identity, gender stability Are two stages that a child will go through and development that many children develop stereotypic behaviors appropriate to their gender identity.

- Kimmel, Michael S. Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men. New York:

Harper, 2008. Print.

Micheal Kimmel discusses how in today's society men are expected to act and behave by rules. Kimmel spends time discussing the list of rules and values known as the "guy code" summarized by Robert Brannon, a social psychologist of the 1970s, he explains that this list must be fallowed in order to be seen as a man by society. Kimmel also mentions the "Gender Police," men and women who are always watching judging and waiting for a guy to mess up in being a man just so they can strip him of his of masculinity. The guy code may be intended to make a boy into a strong, emotionless and dependable man, bottling up emotions and trying to be seen as a man by other men and women can be tiresome. Kimmel discusses that all this pressure of trying to be a man can lead to depression, suicidal behavior, and various other forms of emotional disturbed orders.

-Lapp, Joan. "Boys to Men." Boys to Men Conference. Children Now: 1999. Web

Boys to Men talks about the media's role in identity formation among young boys. The media can broaden the images and messages that define masculinity in certain characters, reinforcing society's definition of masculinity as successful, violent and powerful. The media has summarized men as masculine icons; The Jock, The Strong Quiet Type, The Big Shot and as The Action Hero, all Strong manly men that boys want to be. At a young age boys are constantly surrounded by media showing them images of what men should be like. Interviews with boys between the ages of 8-12 talk about how they never see images of "affectionate" men or it was rare to see a male character play a sensitive part. Being surrounded by images of manly men that display emotional separations or violence, young boys believe that is how a real man should be.

 

-Meek,Will. "Male Gender Role." Psychology of Men. Web. Sat. 17 Nov. 2012

This website was created by Will Meek, a licensed psychologist currently head director of Counseling Services at Washington State University, Vancouver. Meek devoted this website to the study of men and masculinity, Meek says to understand masculinity you have to know what gender is, gender is defined as a set of characteristics or traits that are associated with a certain biological sex, male or female. Meek describes the male gender role as a set of attitudes and behaviors similar to the guy code. Researchers have described the rules of masculinity to be attitudes for a man to hold himself to, ways to look, ways to act and present oneself. The researchers argue that the rules are biological from birth and hard wired into a boys DNA, while others disagree and say that the rules are taught from a boy's surroundings and parents. Meek has come to the conclusion from his research that it is a balance between Biological factors and a boys surroundings that effect masculinity.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Formal Paper #2 (Rough Draft #2)


December 2, 2012

New or expecting Parents

Dear Parents:

We want our sons to be nurturing and our daughters to be assertive; in the end we want our children to be well-rounded. But first we need to recognize that at certain times in a child's development, he or she will establish gender ideals for how to be a male or woman. At this time of development a child connects gender to what they see from their surroundings. Traditionally it could be their father in the garage fixing the car and their mother in the kitchen preparing dinner. If a child's development consists of gender restricted rules or images their development will be dramatically different say that of a child surrounded by gender equal images. A child seeing their mother in the garage helping their father with fixing the car or seeing their father in the kitchen helping their mother prepare dinner; can have a dramatic change in a child's development. I believe a simple change from traditional gender roles to an equal gender role can benefit development in a child. Traditional genders roles can lead to low self-esteem, depression and emotional disconnection while equal gender roles can lead to successful emotional connections, and better confidence in one’s self.

Most children develop a detailed sense of whether they are boys or girls at a young age. This sense of being "a boy" or "a girl" is called gender identity, a term that came into the medical texts in the 1950s. For most children this develops somewhere between 18 and 30 months of age. Gender identity is established by whether one has long hair or short hair, whether one wears dresses or pants, and whether one plays with dolls or trucks.  After gender identity is formed, gender stability develops. Gender stability is the realization that a girl will grow up to be a woman and a little boy is to grow up to be man.  It is during this period of gender stability development that many children develop stereotypic behaviors suitable to their gender identity (Durso). As a result girls sometimes refuse to wear pants because "only boys wear pants." This can happen even if the girl has a mother and other female role models who wear pants. On the other hand boys may become strongly interested in playing with toy guns and action movies.

Traditionally, culture has men and women living by different roles and rules that are gender specific. Men go to work to provide for the family, work around the house and expect dinner on the table at six. Women stay home, clean, take care of the kids and have dinner ready by six. Children at a young age are always learning from what they see and hear, they connect what their parents do to how they should do things. Children raised by specific gender guidelines will develop those same rules in adulthood.

 A woman is given a set of rules similar to men's, but they still develop an ideal image of what a woman needs to be in a traditional household. For young girls seeing their mother do specific gender oriented jobs creates a gender image. For example, my sister is almost thirty years old and believes that she needs a boyfriend to live a normal life. She refuses to do any job that is oriented towards a masculine role, when asking her to help fix fence at the ranch she declines with answers that give her no confidence in her. She was raised thinking that women can’t do jobs that are masculine.

In a traditional house hold, young boys see their fathers living by detailed rules. These rules can be passed down for generations, from father to son, older brother to younger or even the media, and each one gives their ideals of masculinity. Author Micheal Kimmel in "Bros Before Hos" asks college men for their ideals of what it means to be a man, "never show your feelings, never ask for directions, never give up, never give in, be strong, be aggressive, show no fear, show no mercy... (609)" All of the answers he received describe a collection of attitudes and values that together describe what it means to be a man. These rules govern behavior and have required criteria that help a boy or man to be seen as a tough, strong, traditional figure of masculinity.

Personally I grew up in a family were my father would leave for work every morning at 4 am and my mother stayed home. My mother would take my sister and me to school every day then go home and tend to the house. When school ends my sister and I would get picked up by our mother and go home. Around 4pm. my dad would come home from work and dinner would be ready in an hour. It was like this every week day, it was a system my parents had along with designated jobs that had to be done in order for things to work.  During the weekend things didn’t change much, there was still a system to fallow and it still had rules to be fallowed.  I would help my father work, fix or build something every weekend, and that’s all I can remember us doing. If it wasn’t putting up fence in the horse paddock it would be building a chicken coop, everything we did was a “man’s job”. Being with my father every day and looking up to him as my main role model he taught me what it takes to be a man and how a man should act. I grew up fallowing the same rules my father grew up with and after watching him fallow these rules I have seen the effects they cause.

A traditional home leads to a difference in adulthood development between genders and disorders. It can have effects on self-esteem, disconnection from emotions, and depression. There are specific patterns of destructive consequences that develop with gender roles. Woman tend to be less confident and dependent on others while men lack the ability to express emotions and or are disconnected from social interaction. Micheal Kimmel says "Boys are more prone to depression, suicidal behavior, and various forms of out-of-control or out-of-touch behaviors than girls are (616)." It’s believed that boys suffer more from the traditional rules of the Guy Code (Kimmel) because the code leaves boys disconnected from emotions and prohibited from sharing any form of feelings they have with others. For example, many men restrict their emotions. This may have positive moments such as the ability to stay cool in a crisis, but a drawback would be the failure to emotionally connect in a relationship. Overall, research has shown that gender roles are often related to larger problems including depression, anxiety, relationship problems, low self-esteem, violence, and a variety of other undesirable things (Meek).

To go against the traditional it takes parents who don’t fallow the traditional.  Times have changed and so have the roles of the men and woman. The gap between gender roles is narrowing, significantly. For example, fewer men think that it's better for a woman to stay at home than to work. Men are also taking more responsibility for taking care of the kids and household responsibilities, like cooking and cleaning.  As children see how men and woman can share in jobs and not have certain gender oriented jobs it becomes more socially acceptable.
 
 

 

Monday, November 26, 2012

Final Paper Draft # 2

November 25, 2012

New or expecting Parents

Dear Parents:

Children at a young age learn from their surroundings, connecting gender to what they see. Traditionally it could be their father in the garage fixing the car and their mother in the kitchen preparing dinner. If a child's development consists of gender restricted rules or images their development will be dramatically different say that of a child surrounded by gender equal images. A child seeing their mother in the garage helping their father with fixing the car or seeing their father in the kitchen helping their mother prepare dinner, can have a dramatic change in a child's development. I believe a simple change from traditional gender roles to an equal gender role can benefit development in a child. traditional genders roles can lead to low self-esteem, depression and emotional disconnection while equal gender roles can lead to successful emotional connections, and better confidence in ones self.

traditionally, culture has men and women living by different roles and rules that are gender specific. Men go to work to provide for the family, work around the house and expect dinner on the table at six. Women stay home, clean, take care of the kids and have dinner ready by six. Children at a young age are constantly learning from what they see and hear, they connect what their parents do to how they should do things. Children raised by specific gender guidelines will develop those same rules in adulthood.

in a traditional house hold, young boys see their parents living by specific rules. these rules can be passed down for generations, from father to son, older brother to younger or even the media, and each one gives their ideals of masculinity. Author Micheal Kimmel in "Bros Before Hos" asks college men for their ideals of what it means to be a man, "never show your feelings, never ask for directions, never give up, never give in, be strong, be aggressive, show no fear, show no mercy...(609)" All of the answers he received describe a collection of attitudes and values that together describe what it means to be a man. these rules govern behavior and have a required criteria that help a boy or man to be seen as a tough, strong, traditional figure of masculinity.

Woman are not given a set of rules similar to men's, but they still develop a ideal image of what a woman needs to be in a traditional household. For young girls seeing their mother do specific gender oriented jobs creates a gender image. For example, my sister is almost thirty years old and believes that she needs a boyfriend to live a normal life. She refuses to
do any job that is oriented towards a masculine role, when asking her to help fix fence at the ranch she declines with answers that give her no confidence in herself. She was raised thinking that women cant do jobs that are masculine.  

Being raised in a traditional home leads to a difference in adulthood development between genders and disorders. It can have effects on self esteem, disconnection from emotions, and depression. Woman tend to be less confident and dependent on others while men lack the ability to express emotions and or are disconnected from social interaction. Micheal Kimmel says "Boys are more prone to depression, suicidal behavior, and various forms of out-of-control or out-of-touch behaviors than girls are(616)." Its believed that boys suffer more from the traditional rules of the Guy Code(Kimmel) because the code leaves boys disconnected from emotions and prohibited from sharing any form of feelings they have with others.

Still working on more paragraghs, and trying to find new sources after a slight change on my topic.
(new paragragh idea) equal gender roles in a house. the father can go to work and cook dinner or the mother can go to work and still cook dinner....    


Sunday, November 18, 2012

Annotated Bibliography

- Kimmel, Michael S. Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men. New York:

               Harper, 2008. Print.

               Micheal Kimmel discusses how in today's society men are expected to act and behave by rules. Kimmel spends time discussing the list of rules and values known as the "guy code" summarized by Robert Brannon, a social psychologist of the 1970s, he explains that this list must be fallowed in order to be seen as a man by society. Kimmel also mentions the "Gender Police," men and women who are always watching judging and waiting for a guy to mess up in being a man just so they can strip him of his of masculinity. The guy code may be intended to make a boy into a strong, emotionless and dependable man, bottling up emotions and trying to be seen as a man by other men and women can be tiresome. Kimmel discusses that all this pressure of trying to be a man can lead to depression, suicidal behavior, and various other forms of emotional disturbed orders.


- Meek,Will. "Male Gender Role." Psychology of Men. Web. Sat. 17 Nov. 2012

             This website was created by Will Meek, a licenced psychologist currently head director of Counseling Services at Washington State University, Vancouver. Meek devoted this website to the study of men and masculinity, Meek says to understand masculinity you have to know what gender is, gender is defined as a set of characteristics or traits that are associated with a certain biological sex,male or female. Meek describes the male gender role as a set of attitudes and behaviors similar to the guy code. Researchers have described the rules of masculinity to be attitudes for a man to hold himself to, ways to look, ways to act and present oneself. The researchers argue that the rules are biological from birth and hard wired into a boys DNA, while others disagree and say that the rules are taught from a boy's surroundings and parents. Meek has come to the conclusion from his research that is a balance between Biological factors and and a boys surroundings.

-Lapp, Joan. "Boys to Men." Boys to Men Conference. Children Now: 1999. Web

            Boys to Men talks about the media's role in identity formation among young boys. The media can broaden the images and messages that define masculinity in certain characters, reinforcing society's definition of masculinity as successful, violent and powerful. The media has summarized men as masculine icons; The Jock, The Strong Quiet Type, The Big Shot and as The Action Hero, all Strong manly men that boys want to be. At a young age boys are constantly surrounded by media showing them images of what men should be like.Interviews with boys between the ages of 8-12 talk about how they never see images of "affectionate" men or it was rare to see a male character play a sensitive part. Being surrounded by images of manly men that display emotional separations or violence, young boys believe that is how a real man should be.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Proposal #2

Title: Braking the guy code

Author: I am a 19 year old boy, i grew up on a horse ranch working everyday with my father.  Ever sense i could remember i was waking up early to help my dad around the ranch, may it be hanging hot-wire, digging post wholes, fixing fences, building chicken coups or just mowing the lawns. Growing up my father taught me what it takes to be a man, he never said "this is how a man does things." but everyday i learned from watching or doing, just like my father did from his father. I learned the rules of being a man from him and i was expected to fallow these rules. I never noticed until recently but i never did the same chores my sister, my sister helped my mother around the house cleaning or doing laundry. i grew up doing "mans work".

Date: Times are changing, from a time when being a man meant you had to fallow a strict list of rules, to now when its okay to not fallow the list of rules and show emotion.

Topic: Micheal Kimmel's "Bros Before Hos: The Guy Code" and its effects

Exigence: In Micheal Kimmel's "Bros Before Hos: The Guy Code"  Kimmel explains the rules in being a man, how boys are taught these rules, the effects if one doesn't follow the rules he will be ridiculed and be striped of the tittle of MAN and then Kimmel discusses the  psychological development and effects of the Guy Code.  I agree with everything Kimmel says, i agree with the rules of the guy code i agree with what happens if a bot doesn't fallow those rules and the long term psychological development.

Intended Audience: college students and interested readers about the effects of the Guy code rules.

Purpose: To inform skeptical people of the effects that the strict rules the guy code are do effect every boy.

Ethos: I'm a 19 year old male, my father taught me what it means to be a man. I grew up trying to fallow the rules behind being a man, I personally know what happens if you don't fallow the rules set by the guy code.

Pathos: I have countless stories as a kid watching my father work and thinking to my self "when i grow up i want to be just like may dad", being just like my father would make me a real man. But out of all of these memories one is stuck in my mind, I was 13 and helping my dad put up wire horse fence. I would try my best to pull the fence tight against the posts, while my dad would nail it down. For my dad it only took him one swing with the hammer to hide the nail in the post, so long story short, my grip on the fence slipped causing my dad's hand holding the nail to move at the last moment in which his hand with the hammer smashed his fingers. I was terrified, expecting the wrath of god to rain down on my at that moment, but with his fingers turning black and purple right in front of my eyes all he did was gab another nail and ask me "do you think you can hold the fence this time?", he showed no emotion towards the pain or me for messing up. In my mind he was the toughest, strongest and more of a man i have ever seen or met at the time. I have seen my father break the guy code very few times and that makes me think he is even more of a man for doing that.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

RA# 3

Rhetorical Analysis # 3

Title: "Bros Before Hos":The Guy Code

Author: Michael Kimmel

Date: 2008

Topic: Author Michael Kimmel talks about the strict code that young boys have to live by, a code for masculinity, its a day by day check list on how to be a true man in the eyes of other men. Kimmel investigates the values, rites and expectations young boys have to live up to in today's society.

Analysis of Argument

Exigence: Kimmel explains that the "Guy Code" is a collection of rules, traits and values that make a boy seen as a man in today's society. The rules all add up onto a list that is used by almost all men in society to judge a man.

Intended Audience: Kimmel writes to inform the readers, may it be college students or everyday people reading the article in a paper or journal. The intended audience know less about the topic because of the facts and detail kimmel goes into explaining his points.

Purpose: I believe the purpose of this article is to engage the audience and to inform them about the strict rules society pushes on young boys.

Claims: "This is "The Guy Code," the collection of attitudes, values, and traits that together composes what it means to be a man(609)."

Main Evidence: To support his claim Kimmel uses information from college campuses and high schools asking young men what they think it means to be a man and the answers are,  "Don't cry... never show your feelings, never ask for directions, never give up, never give in, be strong, be aggressive, show no fear, show no mercy, get rich, get even...(609)." Kimmel quotes social psychologist Robert Brannon for his summarizing of the four basic rules of masculinity, "No sissy stuff, Be a big wheel, be a sturdy oak, Give'em hell(610)." The four rules almost match exactly with the results Kimmel got from the colleges and high schools.  KImmel then talks about how young boys learn these traits and how they are known by every male, "Guys hear the voices of the men in their lives-fathers, coaches, brothers, grandfathers, uncles, priests-to inform their ideas of masculinity(611)." Its the figures we all grew up with that we learn how to be a man from. Interviews from students in a Sociology of Masculinity class bring up the topic that " Other guys constantly watch how well we preform. Our peers are a kind of "gender police," (612)."  The consent effort to walk, talk, eat, and every mannerism is to be seen as a true man.

Rhetorical Analysis:

Writer's Strategy 1: Description
Writer's Strategy 2: Exemplification
Writer's Strategy 3: Cause and Effect

Reader's Effect 1: Kimmel explains the rules of the guy code, he explains what the rules do to a young boy and how it effects how the boy is seen in society. The facts and details that Kimmel use are all true, me being a boy  can really relate to the guy code.

Reader's Effect 2: Kimmel interviews students around the same age as me and the answer they give are the same i would of given. Every case or example used in this article the reader can relate to.

Reader's Effect 3:  Kimmel explains how the guy code is influenced by fathers, grandfathers, coaches, and masculine figures in a young boys life, the figures form ideals of what it is to be a man. The effects of the guy code can cause a loss in emotions and separation disorders.

My Response:

I found "Bros Before Hos" to be a shockingly true article, everything Kimmel used i can relate to. I grew up with my father, the classic tough emotionless man teaching me how to be strong and self reliable, but i was never pushed to be a tough unemotional man. Just after years of looking up to my father as a hero i have tuned into him. When Kimmel talks about the "Gender Police"  and how every man feels like they are being watched, and the moment they step over the line that defines malignity and femininity they will be striped of their tittle of being man is correct. Every man wants to be seen as tough, strong and dependable, but litter in life i hope the guy code isn't a clear defined line of rules.

Monday, October 29, 2012

RA #2

Title: The Death of Macho
Author: Reihan Salam
Date: 2009
Topic: The era of male dominance in the working and economic force is coming to an end, along with the effects of male unemployment and female employment.

Analysis of Argument

Exigence: Salam explains how the idea of macho is fading from today's society with high male unemployment. Salam believes there are two choices to be made, adaption or Resistance for the roles of males in today's new society.

Intended Audience: Anyone who may be involved in finance along with scholarly audiences,   because of the reasoning and details in the text.

Purpose: To bring light onto how the ideals of males being the primary breadwinners in a family are changing, and Salam mentions the there will be a conflict for the position of power between males and females in the coming years.

Claims:  "The era of male dominance is coming to an end... the world has been witnessing a quiet but monumental hit in power from men to women(629)."

Main Evidence: Author Reihan Salam claims that economic power and status is changing from men to woman, Salam uses many examples in his article. First of all Salam talks about the recession and its impact on men, "Unbelievably disproportionate impact that the current crisis is having on men...so much that the recession in now known to some economists as the "he-cession(630)." Salam is simply saying that men are reviving the main effects of job loss and economic hardship from the recession, Such as "80 percent of job losses in the United States since November have fallen on men(630)." Salam also predicts that "by the end of 2009, the global recession is expected to put as many as 28 million men out of work worldwide(630)."  And things are to only get worse for men as the recession continues, but as man's status fail women's status gain power. The change in Traditional gender roles is another topic Salam brings up, "women were promised economic security in exchange for the state's entrenchment of male economic power(632)." meaning women are gaining more power in roles were men originally had power.

Rhetorical Analysis:
Writer's Strategy 1:(Ethos) The author uses facts and terms that help the reader understand the authors concerns and point of view, for example the male macho.

Writer's Strategy 2: (Logos)The author explains the role of men in society and then compares it to the role men have now after the recession and how women have changed from house wives to main breadwinners in today's families.

Writer's Strategy 3: (Pathos)The author uses vivid language, but connects to the reader very little on an emotional level.

Reader's Effect 1: The authors tone made the reader believe what the author was talking about and helped the reader see from the authors point of view his concerns. The authors resources and facts helped reinforce his ideas and credibility.

Reader's Effect 2:  The authors us of Strong facts and clear information helped the reader understand the article, understand the authors logic behind his reasons and supporting evidence.

Reader's Effect 3: The author used very little Pathos to connect to the reader, but the article didn't need that connection to the reader. The facts along gave the reader a feel of confection.

My Response
This article talks about how the male macho is dying from today's standards of how the world works. I agree with the author Salam, i have noticed more women in power and i encourage the change. One thought i had while reading this was the author had no real opinions on what he was saying, he only gave facts and never encouraged the change or apposed the change. The author didn't use any emotional form of writing to show the reader his opinions.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

RR #2

"Bros Before Hos": The Guy Code" written by sociologist Micheal Kimmel, investigates the values, rites, and preoccupations of what it means to be a man. Kimmel focuses on young men between the ages of sixteen to twenty six, Kimmel starts off by asking the young men what they think it means to be a man, and the answers he gets are really predictable. Kimmel then goes into explaining the ideals of masculinity in America, the pressure that is put onto boys at a young age and the constant efforts it takes to maintain a manly front. The fear of being called "gay" along with the sense of homosexuality and homophobia is what drives many young men to do anything to prove they are toughed and a real man.

Kimmel has traveled to countless colleges and work shoppes around the country asking women what it means to be a woman and asking men what it means to be a man. The response that he got from men go as; donut cry, never show you feelings, take it like a man, and my personal favorite nice guys don't finish last. Kimmel states " all these aphorisms involves never showing emotions or admitting to weakness"(609).  Not showing emotion or always being in control and all rules to being masculine. There has been four rules summarized by a social psychologist Robert Brannon in 1976, No sissy stuff, Be a success, Be reliable in a crisis, and Give'em Hell. There have been multiple studies on these four rules and very little has changed among successive generations of high school and college men.

Kimmel researches the history of the idea of masculinity in America, what he found was that men don't want to impress woman or have an inner drive but the want to be positively evaluated by other men. Other men want to be seen as a "manly man " not a woman's man, they want to be seen as a tough strong man not a feminine man. The development of these ideas as Kimmel point out are from "Other guys constantly watch how well we preform. Our peers are a kind of "gender police", always waiting for us to screw up.."(612). We stay on one side of the fence, the side that keeps us defined as a man defined as masculine. Its the fear of taking one step over the fence and having our manhood taken away its the fear of being labeled as faggot or a wuss. To not conform to the image portrayed by being a man could result in the lose of your manhood, you risk loosing everything and maybe even yourself.

The psychological development of being a man starts early, its a constant test. Boys learn at an early age that their connection to their mother will turn them into a mama's boy and in a result they start to suppress emotions and create distance with suppressing emotions. Even starting school teaches young boys to be tough Kimmel states the messages boys get "Stand on your own two feet! Don't cry! Don't be a sissy!" and Kimmel even quotes a nine-year old "I think it means acting tougher than you actually are"(616). Even at an early age the "boy code" effects young boys and how they are disconnected from emotions. Eventually that code turns into the "guy code" and as they grow older they feel disconnected.

Kimmel's approach to how being a man is a naturally influenced decision and not a biological influence is something i strongly agree with. No boy is born as a distant unemotional child, but he is taught to act how a man acts. When i was young my father taught me to deal with my problems on my own. I have one major memory growing up,i was about the age of seven and i was crying about something and the only thing my father said to me was how crying doesn't solve my problems only doing something about it does. To this day what he said sticks with me and as i get older i see how i am more like him everyday, i don't talk about my emotions and i confront my problems and most of all i haven't  cried since that day my father talked to me. Part of this is because i fear i wont be seen as a man in the eyes of my peers, its a constant though going through the back of my mind " is this manly?" But times are changing slowly.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Final Draft Prop. 30


Proposition 30’s Crisis

 

Times have changed; California's education is failing along with the state budget and now is the time for us as voters to change it. In 2011 the state budget was $25 billion in debt when Gov. Brown started. Over the past year, just trying to balance out the billions of dollars of debt the lawmakers have drastically reduced spending in health, community development, public safety and most importantly education. Even with these drastic cuts the budget remains out of balance and will stay in debt unless something changes. Gov. Brown has proposed a solution, Proposition 30; I believe will work to restore California’s financial budget crisis and Educational system.

                Proposition 30 if passed is estimated to raise $6-9 billion in new revenue each year for public education and public safety. Prop. 30 would raise income taxes 1-3% for seven years on the wealthiest families, the most "blessed", making over $500,000 a year. Sales taxes would be raised by quarter of a cent for the next four years, 90% of prop. 30's revenue will be used to fund public education and safety. Prop. 30's revenue will help fund K-12 schools, preventing a three week cut of school. 11% of the revenue will go towards community colleges. $5.6 billion in funding that can be used for healthcare, and high education is freed up, and a prevention of dramatic cuts to CSUs of $250 million of class cuts, layoffs and enrollment cuts are prevented. The estimated new revenue gives students the opportunity to attend class and be able to go to school giving them the chance to obtain the American dream.

Schools in California have already faced budget cuts that changed how students view school. California schools cannot risk the loss of anymore money.  Without Prop. 30 the schools and colleges face an additional $6 billion in devastating cuts this year. Prop. 30 is the only advantage schools have left that prevents those cuts and at the same time provides billions of new funding for the schools starting this year. If Proposition 30 is rejected according to San Bernardino Sun “…then nearly $6 billion will be cut from the budgets of the state's public schools and universities. The results will be catastrophic: Teachers across the state will be laid off; admissions at state colleges and universities will be cut; tuition at California State Universities will go up by $150 a semester; k-12 students will have their school years cut by more than a week, and the state's slowly recovering economy could be thrown into a tailspin ". And that's just in the first year.  With the billions of dollars’ of cuts even more classes, layoff of faculty, staff and enrollment cuts will be enforced.  Law enforcement, fire departments and public safety funding will take a sustainable reduction. The cuts will continue until the economy significantly improves or the state finds a very large gold pot at the end of a rainbow.

However in the end its go to work and pay up or no education and watch California’s budget crisis drag it into darkness. As a student I pay for my classes, and in return I have to work to be able to go to school. I am a 19 year old college student and this is my second year at Cabrillo. Even if my first year I had trouble getting into the classes I wanted, I was on the wait-list for all of my classes but one. This semester I had a small list of classes to choose from still. The class sizes, the cutting of programs and classes have affected me dramatically. The more classes that get cut means the price of the other classes go up along with the book prices, which in return means I have to work more hours taking away my time to be in school. Not to mention the increase of students trying to get into a class with limited seats. I have had to stand in the back of class rooms listening to lectures while others stand outside the door all because of the increasing cuts. I have seen teachers turn students away at the door due to oversized classes. Originally I only had to spend three years at college to obtain the units I need for my career, now after class cuts, an increase of hours at work to pay for school and not being able to get into a class those three years have turned out to be closer to four or five.

 Everyone has an "American dream" may it be to be rich and powerful or to be a school teacher. My dream is to be able to have a family and to be able to provide whatever they need, the classic white picket fence. This is achieved through hard work, dedication and a strong educational background. But with the current educational crisis I fear for the future of the American dream. Everyone deserves and needs an opportunity for a strong education and without the chance for proposition 30 to restore the state’s budget I fear that the American dream will almost be impossible to obtain, but with the help of proposition 30 there is a chance for America's education and the American dream.

In this time of economic disaster proposition 30 gives the state the chance to help relieve the damage from budget cuts and to restore some of the education, public safety, and community services. Prop. 30 give California the opportunity to change its future. However there are some groups that are against prop. 30. According to the Santa Cruz Sentinel say that proposition 30 is not needed because “it's unlikely that all the trigger cuts will happen as threatened. The evidence for this comes from previous trigger cuts that were threatened but never materialized as deeply as threatened”. So maybe all the trigger cuts won’t go into effect, but even a $2 billion cut in school funding would be devastating to the schools and the economy. That cut would further cripple the economic growth. Another major point brought to the table is that the raising off taxes will destroy family businesses and small businesses, but according to the department of finance, the revenue from this proposition represents just over half of what was lost when three other taxes expired in 2010 and 2011. The overall tax burden will still be lower than it was two years ago. In the Bakersfield Californian an article points out that, “contrary to the governor's claims, Proposition 30 does not create new revenue for schools; it merely restores some of what's already been cut”. Meaning the $5.6 billion in funding that is saved for healthcare, and high education is not new money for the schools to do whatever with, all the money would do is replace what is missing in union costs for teachers and their pensions, still some money is better than none.

In this economic time of disaster education is facing devastating cuts if proposition 30 isn't passed, more cuts to California's already poorly funded system means less classes, smaller class sizes, less availability and not to mention higher class prices for students. Proposition 30 gives the state a chance to help relieve the budget cuts and to restore some of the education, public safety, and community services in California. Proposition 30 sets the stage for the restoration of California's budget crisis. Proposition 30 is no substitute for long-term reforms, but it is a measured and functional response to this crisis.

Vote yes on proposition 30.

 

               

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Rough Draft

times have changed, California's education is failing along with the state budget and now is the time for us as voters to change it. In 2011 the state budget was $25 billion in debt when Gov. Brown started. Over the past year, just trying to balance out the billions of dollars of debt the lawmakers have drastically reduced spending in health, community development, public safety and most importantly education. even with these drastic cuts the budget remains out of balance and will stay in debt unless something changes. Gov. Brown has proposed a solution, that i believe will work if passed Proposition 30.

Proposition 30 if passed is estimated to raise $6-9 billion in new revenue each year for public education and public safety. Prop. 30 would raise income taxes 1-3% for seven years on the wealthiest families, the most "blessed", making over $500,000 a year. Sales taxes would be raised by 1/4 cent for the next four years, 90% of prop. 30's revenue will be used to fund public education and safety. Prop. 30's revenue will help fund K-12 schools, preventing a three week cut of school. 11% of the revenue will go towards community colleges. $5.6 billion in funding that can be used for healthcare, and high education is freed up, and a prevention of dramatic cuts to CSUs of $250 million of class cuts, layoffs and enrollment cuts are prevented. The estimated new revenue gives students the opportunity to attend class and be able to go to school giving them the chance to obtain the American dream.

Schools in California have already faced budget cuts that changed how students view school. California schools cannot risk the loss of anymore money. If proposition 30 doesn't pass a series of "trigger" cuts will go into effect. If rejected according to kcet.org " Schools and community colleges would take a hit on nearly $5.4 billion, and many other departments would see reductions too". resulting in even more class cuts, layoff of faculty, staff and enrollment cuts. Law enforcement, fire departments and public safety funding will take a sustainable reduction.

As a student i pay for my classes, and in return i have to work to be able to go to school. I am a 19 year old college student and this is my second year at Cabrillo. Even if my first year i had trouble getting into the classes i wanted, i was on the wait-list for all of my classes but one. This semester i had a small list of classes to choose from still. The class sizes, the cutting of programs and classes have effected me dramatically. The more classes that get cut means the price of the other classes go up along with the book prices, which in return means i have to work more hours taking away my time to be in school. Not to mention the increase of students trying to get into a class with limited seats. I have had to stand in the back of class rooms listening to lectures while others stand outside the door all because of the increasing cuts. I have seen teachers turn students away at the door due to over sized classes. Originally i only had to spend three years at college to optaine the units i need for my career, now after class cuts, an increase of hours at work to pay for school and not being able to get into a class those three years have turned out to be closer to four or five.

Everyone has a "american dream" may it be to be rich and powerful or to be a school teacher. My dream is to be able to have a family and to be able to provide whatever they need, the classic white picket fence. This is achieved through hard work, dedication and a strong educational background. But with the current educational crisis i fear for the future of the american dream. Everyone deserves and needs a opportunity for a strong education and without the chance for proposition 30 to restore the states budget i fear that the american dream will almost  be impossible to obtain, but with the help of proposition 30 there is a chance for America's education and the american dream.

In this time of economic disaster proposition 30 gives the state the chance to help relieve the damage from budget cuts and to restore some of the education, public safety, and community services. Prop. 30 gives California the opprotunity to change its future. However there are some groups that are against prop. 30.  They say that proposition 30 will destroy family businesses and small businsses through the raising of taxes. In the LAtimes proposition was referred to as a "$50 billion political shell game"  meaning that funding is not guaranted to schools. But proposition is the first step in many hopefully to restore California's debt and education

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Proposal

Title: Proposition 30 Budget cost

Author: I am a 19 year old college student, this is my second year at Cabrillo. Even in my first year i had trouble getting the classes i wanted, and this semester i had to pick from a small selection of classes that still had openings on the wait-list. The cut backs have effected me personally, and will continue to get worse with time if something is not done. i fear for the future years and future students of Proposition 30 isn't passed. 

Date: In this economic time of disaster prop. 30 gives the state a chance to help relieve the budget cuts and to restore some of the education, public safety, and community services. Proposition 30 sets the stage for the restoration of California's budget crisis. 

Topic: Op-Ed article on Proposition 30. 

Exigence: Education is facing devastating cuts if proposition 30 isn't passed, more cuts to California's already poorly funded system means less classes, smaller class sizes, less availability and not to mention higher class prices for students. For students who have to pay for there own schooling means more hours at work and less time for school. 

Intended Audience: Undecided voters, and fellow college students. 

Purpose: To inform my readers of proposition 30 and its potential benefits for California

Ethos: I am a student who has to pay for my classes, that means i have to work for the cash to pay the increasing prices of classes and books. With the budget cuts there are fewer classes and fewer chances to get in to the class with limited spots, not to mention the increase of students trying to get into one class. I have had to stand in the back of the room listening to lectures, leave a class room and in some cases I have seen students stand outside the door all because class rooms are limited by the increasing cuts. 

Pathos: Every parent wants the best for their child, and everyone wants to live the "American Dream". When i was just a small boy i dreamed of having a family and being able to provide whatever they needed the classic white picket fence, To me that is living the american dream. This is achieved by hard work and a strong educational background but with the current education crisis i fear for the future of the american dream. Everyone needs a opportunity for a strong education, and without Prop. 30 the drastic budget cuts threaten the american dream. But with Prop. 30 there is a chance for America's education.

Logos: Proposition can raise $6-9 Billion in new revenue each year by raising sales tax by a quarter-cent for four years, and increase personal income taxes for seven years for those who make more than $250,000 in annual earnings a year. With the possible passing of Proposition 30 in November it could bring tax payer's money to K-12 schools, prevent a $ 250 million budget cut to CSU's avoid class cuts, layoffs and prevent enrollment cuts. With Prop. 30's passing it frees up $56 billion in funding that can go to education, health care, and other public services. There are some people who say proposition 30 is bad for the state, they say it will destroy small business and jobs with the threat that the new revenue will not go to the schools. 

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Annotated Bibliographie


http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/16/local/la-me-brown-taxes-20120816

York, Anthony. "Gov. Jerry Brown Formally Kicks off Prop. 30 Tax Hike Campaign." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 16 Aug. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/16/local/la-me-brown-taxes-20120816>.

In this article, Anthony York talks about Gov. Jerry Brown formally starting off his campaign for Proposition 30. The November ballot will temporary raise sales taxes and an income surcharge on California’s highest income earners. The proposition will add a quarter-cent to the statewide sales tax until 2016, then income tax rates of individuals earning more than $250,000 a year will increase. When asked about the financial negligence about the parks department, and the millions of dollars in accounting errors elsewhere Brown became impatient and simply said “…This is not about any other issues…. It's not about parks.” Focusing on only the schools might make voters reluctant to trust Sacramento with more of their tax dollars.

"It's about taking money from the most blessed and giving it to the schools," Gov. Brown


http://www.calfac.org/post/prop-30-facts

This article only talks about the positive facts of Prop. 30. The Schools & Safety Protection Act, is the only advantage that can protect school, safety funding and aid the state’s continuing budget mess.

“Our state budget problem was built up over a decade, and it won’t be fixed overnight. These temporary increases will ensure funding for our schools until the economy improves.” – Jerry Brown, AP, 06/28/12

“The future of education is bleak if the tax hike fails.”
Jack Scott, California Community Colleges Chancellor,
– Los Angeles Times, 07/18/12

 


Smith, S.E., and Bronwyn Harris. "In Califrnia, What Is Prop 13?" WiseGeek. Conjecture, 11 June 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://www.wisegeek.com/in-california-what-is-prop-13.htm>.

 In this article, S.E. Smith explains how proposition 13 does not allow property taxes to rise no more than one percent of a home's assessed value, property values could not rise by more than two percent per year, the only way for a property to be assessed at a new value is when the property is sold. Smith then explains how a required two thirds majority is the only way to increase any taxes in California, making it difficult to pass laws to raise the tax rate. An immediate affect from Prop. 13 was a dramatic decrease in property tax income, as in result a struggle for state income for schools and other organizations.  

Sunday, September 16, 2012

R.R. (Against school)

            We all have to go through school but not all of us spend the same amount of years in it. John Taylor Gatto writes about school teachers and students being bored, the work being stupid and the information common sense.  In Gatto's essay "Against School" he argues against the strict regulations of education and the forced routine of classes day after day for twelve plus years. Gatto talks about how success is an image created dependently on schooling, how schools create the future according to consumer markets with the students to be employees and consumers not leaders and adventures. but i want to know what ever happened too not needing a fourteen year education, there was a time when all you needed for a future was motivation.
             
           On a regular basis our education is defined to make good people, good citizens, and to make each person his or her best, but written in The American Mercury of April 1924 " the aim is to simply reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level...and train a standardized citizenry"(H.L. Mencken). An educational system designed to produce limited intellects all for the populace to be "manageable". A Prussian culture of education adopted by America all because industrialized, compulsory schooling can divide children to eventually separate the mass of mankind so there could never be a dangerous whole with the threat of "revolution". A separated mass of consumers and followers is easier to control than it is a mankind of adventures and leaders. Gatto sheds light on how schools shape students into what today's lifestyle needs consumers, and a manageable society.
             
             Whatever happened to the rebels who dropped out of school? did they vanish off the face of the planet? or are they living on the streets?

             I am sure that some of the people who never completed school did vanish but what makes a difference is motivation and dedication. My father never graduated high school or even started college, he dropped out and started working for a cross country trucking company. Eventually he got into construction and slowly worked his way up the chain of command, he is now an area manager in charge of multiple job sites, he did this with out ever having a complete education. There was a time when a complete education wasn't needed all it took was dedication and the ability to work hard for a better future. Those days have changed into the more degrees you have the better chance of a well paying job, however there is no fine line saying "you will have this job after X amount of years" you are never promised the job you have spent years in school for. And after all the years of school how will you change professions if you want or need to? go back to school for another couple of years? but you are still not promised that job.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Reader Response #1 (Op-Ed article)


This article Prop 30 Cheat Sheet: Jerry Brown's Tax Measure” introduces proposition 30, a constitutional amendment known as the Schools & Local Public Safety Protection Act.  This Act would raise the personal income tax on individuals for the next seven years also raise the state sales tax by a quarter cent for the next four years. The new revenues would be used to help stabilize the state budget and to fund schools, predicted with an additional $6.6 billion for education. But if voters reject the Act, a series of reductions "trigger cuts" would go into effect, schools and community colleges would take a hit of nearly $5.4 billion along with many other departments.

Individuals making more than $250,000 per year for the next seven years would see a raise in personal income tax rates by as much as 3 percent; however individuals making less than $250,000 and couples making less than $500,000 a year will see no increase. State sales tax would be raised by as much as much as a quarter cent for the next four years, but both tax increases are only temporary with the passing of Proposition 30. An increase in new revenues would automatically result in education funding with the money from the new taxes being placed in a special account and divided up between K-12 and a percent going to community colleges. If Prop 30 is rejected by voters new spending reductions “trigger cuts” will go into effect with schools and community colleges by causing budget cuts of up to $5.4 billion. Prop 30 just doesn’t affect schools but certain public safety programs like the incarceration of some adult prisoners, supervision of parolees, and substance abuse treatment.

If it passes, the state would see an increase of billions of dollars to help cover education and balance the budget but if not passed, it would face a serious shortage and begin making a series of trigger cuts to government programs to reduce overall spending. Prop 30 would ensure that payments for education and government would continue annually. However Legislatures can take existing money from schools and use it for other purposes, replacing it with money from Prop 30, resulting in no new money for education.  So prop 30 is basically an act that keeps the schools funds at one level, not necessarily giving more money to the schools.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Week One

1. I believe that "Para Teresa" was written in English and Spanish because it helps the reader picture the narrator better and where she comes from in her heritage. The use of two languages gives us a look at both sides of the conflict, in a way it separates the two sides. One side is to fallow her "sister" and to cause trouble or to do what her family wants and to do her best in school.

2. The fight in Para Teresa is a reflection that could of been triggered by a school year book, photo, or the possibility of the narrator recently seeing Teresa. With the challenges the narrator had to face in school the choices she had to make; choosing between her friend, the social norm and what she felt was right was her way of defiance. Teresa's defiance was different from the narrators but she understood how Teresa felt and how they both had their own ways of defiance making them sisters in the end. 

6. Prop 30, is an initiative constitutional amendment also known as the Schools & Local Public Safety Protection Act. Proposition 30 would effect individuals making more than $250,000 per year for the next seven years by raising personal income tax by as much as 3 percent. But individuals making less than $250,000 and couples making less than $500,00 a year would see no change. Proposition 30 would raise state sales tax by a quarter cent for the next four years and the revenue will be used to balance the state budget and funding school. An increase in revenues automatically results in more education funding, money from the new taxes will be placed in a special account called the Education Protection Account. That money would be divvied up, with a percent going to K-12 schools and community colleges. If the Proposition does not get approved a series of reductions known as the "trigger cuts" will go into effect and schools including community colleges would see reductions of nearly $5.4 billion. The two tax measures Prop 30 and Prop 38 could affect each other. The state constitution already provides that when two measures conflict, the one with the most votes passes. If Prop 38 gets more votes, that would mean Prop 30 loses and the "trigger cuts" would go into effect.

Proposition 30

Prop: 30
www.kcet.org/news/ballotbrief/elections2012/propositions/prop-30-cheat-sheet-jerry-browns-tax-to.html

     

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I am.




                  I am the child that grew up in mud, burnt ants with a magnifying glass and spent my nights

adventuring in the dark. I have lived on a horse ranch my whole life; I used to think it was horrible, 

having to do chores every day but growing up the way I did it taught me life lessons. When I was 

younger I thought the kids living in the city were lucky and that they had it better, but after 19 years I 

realized I was the lucky kid. I love the outdoors to much to have grown up in the city. I came from a 

strong loving family with friends who have been through hell with me. I have a few near death stories 

of my own,a love story, and a few stories of loss. I have traveled to Germany, Prague, France, Poland 

and some other small countries, but I prefer the beaches and warm summer nights here. I love to draw 

and sketch,I have painted a few murals, but what I truly wish I could get into is tattooing. I love the 

stories, reasons and culture behind tattoos, my first tattoo I got is on my ribs and I was 15 at the time, 

both my parents allowed me to get it. I wanted my ears pierced when I was in high school but when I 

asked my father he said he would rather let me get a tattoo, so i took him up on the offer.

                    Originally I thought wanted to be a professional chief because I like to cook and to cook 

for others but I realized I only learned to cook because I didn’t want to end up like my sister, the 22 

year old who can’t cook chicken without leaving the plastic on the frozen bird. I have always thought 

of doing something in law enforcement or military. After talking to one of my father’s old friends who 

is a Game Warden, and going on a few ride-alongs, I have decided to be a Fish and Game warden, and 

a warden is not a park ranger. A Warden enforces wildlife laws, protects natural resources and controls

poaching with the same authority as a police officer. One of the main reasons I wanted to be a Warden

is because there is no office hours, just hours to complete outside on patrol.

                     As for what I bring to the class, it has to be open-mindedness; I will usually have more 

than one opinion on a topic. Every once in a while I will have a bad day, but mainly my opinions are 

positive. Writing is not always the strongest topic for me, it all depends on the prompt. But in the end I 

like a challenge that changes my opinion or my point of view.